tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 06 05:10:28 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
Subject: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:07:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Alan Anderson wrote:

> The odd thing is that I don't have a big problem treating it as a  
> first person subject when the verb prefix asks me to.

That *is* odd. What would you make of this:

    qorDu' reghom qorDu'

SuStel
Stardate 7930.3

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
  - From: "Michael Roney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
  - From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
- Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
  - From: Doq <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
  - From: QeS 'utlh <[email protected]>
- Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
  - From: Doq <[email protected]>
- Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
  - From: Doq <[email protected]>
- Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
  - From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Vegas action just for you
Next by Date: Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
Previous by thread: Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}
Next by thread: Re: Prefix and noun agreement (was: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu})
Index(es):