tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 06 06:17:00 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: usage of type-7 aspect suffix {-pu}

McArdle (

--- Doq <> wrote:

> ...
> (chenmoH is an  
> action verb, not a stative one -- it would be
> stative without the - 
> moH)
> ...

I don't understand this.  I don't know how {chen} is
used in canon (other than as part of {chenmoH}), but
it's defined as "build up, take form" and this doesn't
seem like a stative concept to me.  Isn't taking form
(unlike "having form") an active process rather than a

-- mI'qey

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Back to archive top level