tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 15 08:44:45 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Saw

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Saw
• Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:44:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected] >
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Voragh:
> > Try {Sawlu'pu'bogh loD} "a man that has married (a woman)"

Holtej:
>I would think {Sawpu'bogh loD} (without the {-lu'}, if you want the
>{loD} as subject), right?

Absolutely right.  I was too quick with the copy-and-paste there.




--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

• References:
  • Saw
    • From: "Beth Baisch *tuftedpuffin*" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Saw
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Saw
    • From: "d'Armond Speers, Ph.D." <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: question about position of suffixes
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: rIQ (verb)
• Previous by thread: Re: Saw
• Next by thread: Re: Saw
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level