tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 07:42:15 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC
• Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gj/dmrw1uIheHNy481FuMBD/1NW6Bi3Cwren3UDhxcY4SBZS8zTPQv0lD5MBUv8vksWXOWBhxyUL7ktW6A6HaUqM2WaT4GRPzeb+QMI+NC3tCSSSCu3I7R3BSIF7v4eZEiuYTNzrzx4uMhvke3hUnNROEV0lcDXRx092hU9grgo= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> ja' Voragh:
> 
> > QeS:
> >>> ...I'm not sure that true adverbs can modify
> each other; I know  
> >>> of no canon evidence either way.
> >
> > I found two, though one is poetry/song:
> >
> >    batlh maHeghbej 'ej yo' qIjDaq vavpu'ma' DImuv.
> >    pa' reH maSuvtaHqu'
> >    Then we die with honor and join our fathers in
> the Black Fleet
> >    where we battle forever. (Anthem)
> 
> How are the adverbs modifying each other here?  Each
> is in its own  
> sentence and has no apparent connection to the
> other.
>

I believe he is referring to {pa'} and {reH}, not
modifying each other, but both modifying
{maSuvtaHqu'}.

-- ter'eS

• References:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level