tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 04 05:52:33 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC
• Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=JRi+bZ9hKRHp8lVH6r35t0/iIURr4+n+Yf1yNCSlkp5Uu/+ya+lrBEo3ZEOLEmodrDLrOTxdeL1EZIMQn+EWq6TZrSb0hp/M1/iit7xhFOC9+NfXxquP9L83ygjGzR2w1bthO+ETX+xPmZUMMPGRp+YCW/YqoQwCYSjfYmPycwo= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- Alan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

> ja' ter'eS:
> 
> > --- Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I was looking at {pa' reH ...} but now realize
> that {pa'} is not an
> >> adverbial in Klingon, but a noun used as a
> place-stamp.  Just call me
> >> anglocentric!
> >
> > But if it isn't functioning adverbially, I don't
> > know what you'd say it's doing there.
> 
> It's being a locative.  In Klingon grammar, that's
> not the same thing  
> as an adverbial.

And locatives are adverbial in function, by any
definition I know.

-- ter'eS

> 
> 

• References:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level