tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 03 07:46:44 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC
• Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QKjjYm0CH/EEXdj5tsqe5H8lzUSVG22PpwmGelUryvLPcMOxSWBs2S/JURPTvD+z/YRTCPuK9XNDB+svODThTc5PorXWwYq5tgwp+tHXkJTU0XLyxwxZTw3KYXkY8J7Mp9PJLoIVDfil8sbqZQZg71hQXC+iTvtPi7syItO7jqc= ;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

--- Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:

> QeS:
> > >>> ...I'm not sure that true adverbs can modify
> each other; I know
> > >>> of no canon evidence either way.
> 
> Voragh:
> > > I found two, though one is poetry/song:
> > >
> > >    batlh maHeghbej 'ej yo' qIjDaq vavpu'ma'
> DImuv.
> > >    pa' reH maSuvtaHqu'
> > >    Then we die with honor and join our fathers
> in the Black Fleet
> > >    where we battle forever. (Anthem)
> 
> ghunchu'wI':
> >How are the adverbs modifying each other here? 
> Each is in its own
> >sentence and has no apparent connection to the
> other.
> 
> I was looking at {pa' reH ...} but now realize that
> {pa'} is not an 
> adverbial in Klingon, but a noun used as a
> place-stamp.  Just call me 
> anglocentric!
> 

But if it isn't functioning adverbially, I don't
know what you'd say it's doing there.

-- ter'eS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: KLBC
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC
• Previous by thread: Re: KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level