tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 29 11:30:50 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: lut tlhegh

Regina Reusser ([email protected])

• From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: lut tlhegh
• Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:30:36 +0200
• References: <003101c4a154$260d09d0$6401a8c0@SENARA> <[email protected]>

... tagha' ngabwI' lut 'ay' vIlaDta', 'ej tlhoS Hoch vIyaj.
mu'tlheghmeyvam vIyajbe', vaj HIboQ...:

> pay' jach targh, 'ej yovchoH.

> not HoH, 'ach tlhuHmoH! 'Iw tlhorgh tlhonmDu'DajDaq 'Iw tuj ghopDu'DajDaq
> lutu'lu'. latlh neH.

Senara

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lut tlhegh
    • From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • lut tlhegh
    • From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>
  • Re: lut tlhegh
    • From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: (?) interrogative suffix on imperatives?
• Next by Date: Re: lut tlhegh
• Previous by thread: Re: lut tlhegh
• Next by thread: Re: lut tlhegh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level