tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 29 12:49:44 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: lut tlhegh

ngabwI' ([email protected])

From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: lut tlhegh
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:48:34 -0400
References: <003101c4a154$260d09d0$6401a8c0@SENARA> <[email protected]> <000401c4a652$6a35b410$6401a8c0@SENARA>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: lut tlhegh

> ... tagha' ngabwI' lut 'ay' vIlaDta', 'ej tlhoS Hoch vIyaj.
> mu'tlheghmeyvam vIyajbe', vaj HIboQ...:
>
>> pay' jach targh, 'ej yovchoH.

"Suddenly, the targ screamed, and began to charge"

>> not HoH, 'ach tlhuHmoH!

"He (the boy) never killed, but it was exhilarating"

>> 'Iw tlhorgh tlhonmDu'DajDaq 'Iw tuj ghopDu'DajDaq
>> lutu'lu'. latlh neH.

jItuH'eghmoHlaw'.
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.

Wow. That's really mangled. I apologize. I'm going to try to get more sleep 
before posting.

I meant:
{tlhonDu'DajDaq 'Iw tlhorgh tu'lu', 'ej ghopDu'DajDaq 'Iw tuj tu'lu'. latlh 
neH.}

Try that, and I'm going to find a hole to be swallowed up into. }}; )

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org
HovpoH 702104.5

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lut tlhegh
  - From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>

References:
- lut tlhegh
  - From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>
- Re: lut tlhegh
  - From: "ngabwI'" <[email protected]>
- Re: lut tlhegh
  - From: "Regina Reusser" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: lut tlhegh
Next by Date: Re: lut tlhegh
Previous by thread: Re: lut tlhegh
Next by thread: Re: lut tlhegh
Index(es):