tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 17 18:06:29 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)

QeS lagh ([email protected])

• From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:05:48 +1000
• Bcc:

ghItlhpu' Voragh:

>But that's exactly my point:  Why does there have to be?  Why assume that 
>Klingon grammarians have one word for both types of suffix just because we 
>do?

My only problem would be that then neither word can refer to the number 
suffixes {-DIch} and {-logh}.

QeS lagh

_________________________________________________________________
Find love today with ninemsn personals. Click here:  
http://ninemsn.match.com?referrer=hotmailtagline

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: bey
• Next by Date: Direct quote of written statement
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level