tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 19 10:32:21 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)

Steven Boozer ([email protected])

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:32:07 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

Voragh:
> >But that's exactly my point:  Why does there have to be?  Why assume that
> >Klingon grammarians have one word for both types of suffix just because we
> >do?

QeS lagh:
>My only problem would be that then neither word can refer to the number
>suffixes {-DIch} and {-logh}.

chaq mu' wejDIch Sovbe'lu'bogh tu'lu'?  <mon>
(Maybe there's a third, unattested word? <g>)



-- 
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
    • From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
    • From: "QeS lagh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: wen (n)
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: toy'wI''a' (n)
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: mojaq (n)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level