tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 30 16:01:54 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: bom tu'qa'lu'



In a message dated 6/30/2003 3:41:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

> 
> 
> On 30 Jun 2003 at 15:15, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > tlhIngan bom vItu'qa'. pongDaj: <tlhIngan Hubbeq>. QuvDaj:
> > http://www.geocities.com/teresh_2000/klinbom.html
> > Daq vIDabbogh Sov pagh. bomvetlh boQoyta'DI' tuHoH boneHbejmo',
> > jIHvaD Do' ghu'vetlh.
> > 
> > -- ter'eS
> 
> majQa'
>

qatlho'neS
 
> I wanted to post a link to this on a BBS I'm on, I said this, is it right?
> 
> tlhIngan Hol lutIv nuvpu'vaD. tlhIngan "Rock" bommey SaH naDev!
> 
> I was intending to say "For those who really like Klingon, here are some Klingon rock 
> songs."
> 
(Since this isn't marked KLBC, I'll take a stab at it)
Very close, but in the first phrase, you need the relative suffix to
express "those who", so it should be 

tlhIngan Hol lutIvbogh nuvpu'vaD...

The second phrase is more usually expressed

naDev tlhIngan "Rock" bommey tu'lu'.

In fact, you have to put the {naDev} at the beginning; this
is where locative adverbs always go.

Then, since the first phrase is no longer an independent
sentence, you need to adjust the punctuation to join the
two phrases:

tlhIngan Hol lutIvbogh nuvpu'vaD, naDev tlhIngan "Rock" bommey tu'lu'.

-- ter'eS
 
> Am an absolute beginner here, although you may have known 
> me at my previous 
> address, decided to get in a bit further with this one.
> 
> qeraQ'


Back to archive top level