tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 19 23:41:38 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:59:20 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <a05111b10b9991d2b00cb@[151.25.221.190]>
• References: <[email protected]><a05111b00b98eac74cc6d@[151.25.222.84]><a05100310b99704131a58@[10.0.1.3]><a05111b10b9991d2b00cb@[151.25.221.190]>

jIja'pu':
>Do NOT include sentences like {batlh bIHeghjaj} when trying to figure out
>an underlying explanation for nouns' behavior.

ja' tulwI':
>i STOPped and now i think that i don't understand why i stopped. why
>i shall not include /batlh/? any taboo that i forgot?

The reason is simple:  In that sentence, {batlh} is not a noun.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: tova'Daq (n)
• Next by Date: Re: Temptress of the stars - text
• Prev by thread: RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
• Next by thread: RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level