tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 22 13:50:11 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
>jIja'pu':
>>Do NOT include sentences like {batlh bIHeghjaj} when trying to figure out
>>an underlying explanation for nouns' behavior.
>
>ja' tulwI':
>>i STOPped and now i think that i don't understand why i stopped. why
>>i shall not include /batlh/? any taboo that i forgot?
>
>The reason is simple: In that sentence, {batlh} is not a noun.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI'
i think no one wants to keep on discussing this now (as we would only
repeat over and over the same arguments).
thank you.
tulwI',
sts.