Re: ??HolDaq

[willm@cstone.net]

> Regarding a sentence like "HolvamDaq vIghun":
..
> >We don't know for sure.  The definition is "participate", not
"participa> te 
> >in".  Those that are willing to stretch definitions use it without
-Daq.>   
> >Those that play it safe use it with -Daq.
> 
> Oh, you mean like "tlhIngan Hol ghomDaq jeStaH"??
> 
> Sooo... how does -Daq imply physical locality more in this latter case
th> an 
> in the former? Just curious as to your thots on the matter.

I've always preferred {tlhIngan Hol ghomvaD jeStaH}, but that's only because it 
makes more sense to me that way. I'm not sure it is right. There is no location 
involved, though there is clearly a beneficiary (in the grammatical sense).
 
> -- 
> Andrew Strader

Will