tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 29 17:00:28 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: obtuse question



[ben loDnal]

ja' SuStel:
>Unless there's context to the contrary, I think the natural implication
>would be that the husband is no longer a husband.

jIQoch.  <cha'vatlh ben HIq> yIqel.

Saurian brandy is still Saurian brandy two hundred years later.

>cha' ben loDnal
>husband of two years ago

Based on the "two hundred years ago ale" example, I interpret this to be
talking about someone who has been a husband for that long and is most
likely still one.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh




Back to archive top level