tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 10 23:48:02 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: divorce



In a message dated 7/8/2000 3:44:45 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< I would prefer merely to ignore it as an example of anything useful.  If
 we're calling it {no' Hol}, it tells us nothing that we can use in {ta'
 Hol}.  If I'm being invited to correct the grammar, the grammar is assumed
 to be wrong and should not be emulated.
  >>

I did not invite you to correct the grammar when I posted the way to say 
"divorce."

peHruS


Back to archive top level