tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 11 19:20:42 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: divorce
ja' peHruS:
>In a message dated 7/8/2000 3:44:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
>[email protected] writes:
>
><< I would prefer merely to ignore it as an example of anything useful. If
> we're calling it {no' Hol}, it tells us nothing that we can use in {ta'
> Hol}. If I'm being invited to correct the grammar, the grammar is assumed
> to be wrong and should not be emulated.
> >>
>
>I did not invite you to correct the grammar when I posted the way to say
>"divorce."
Nor have you yet told us why you think {ngoS tlhogh} is that way.
ghuy'cha', peHruS! QIn Dajangbogh DalaD'a' jay'?
SoH nIjangbe' mu'mey Dacha'bogh.
DuHmey chupbogh Voragh vIqel. yIqIm, dammit!
-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh