tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 20 10:46:22 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: qama'

• From: david joslyn <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: qama'
• Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 13:45:50 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Lieven L. Litaer wrote:

jIghItlh:
> > Is it just me, or is there some significance in the fact that all the
> > "verbs of speaking" begin with "ja"? 

ja' muHwI'
> I don't know why, but it's true. 
> Read KGT page 30. MO names {jat} as slang for "mumble". Others are ja',
> jatlh,  jach, and jaw I remeber.

Wait...does this mean <jatmey> could also mean "mumblings"?
No, wait...that would be <jatwI'mey>. Oh well.


quljIb

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: qama'
    • From: Matt Johnson <[email protected]>
  • Re: qama'
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: qama'
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: qama'
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fresh Food in Space
• Next by Date: Re: vavwI'
• Prev by thread: Re: qama'
• Next by thread: Re: qama'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level