tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 17 15:55:05 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Equality
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Equality
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:56:27 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:05:51 -0800 (PST) [email protected]
wrote:
> In a message dated 3/15/1999 9:36:42 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> <<
> Second, since {rap} means "be equal", not the transitive "be equal to
> (something else)", it can't take {-chuq}. This is the suffix used for
> reciprocal objects, NOT reciprocal subjects. >>
> ===============================================
> DabachHa'pu'. TKD p.36 DalIngqa'chu' 'ach DapojHa'bej. "This suffix is used
> only with plural subjects." DaghItlhchu'pu'mo' qatlh DungDaq "This is the
> suffix used for reciprocal objects, NOT reciprocal subjects" Daqon?
qechDaj vIyaj 'ach mu'mey wIvHa'law'. reH wot tlhejDI'
<<-chuq>>, *subject* *object* je Da *subject*. *object*
lo'laHbe'law'mo' mu' <<rap>>, ghaytanHa' <<-chuq>> lo'laH
<<rap>>.
> chovnatlhmey Daghaqmo' mojaq {-chuq} lajlaH Doch qelbogh wot 'e' DaDaj. 'ach
> mojaq {-chuq} lajlaHbe' Doch qelbe'bogh wot 'e' Datobbe' 'e' vItu'.
It seems so obvious. chay' TKD DalaDHa'laHchu'taH? qechvam
yajHa' wa' tlhIngan jatlhwI' neH: SoH. nIteb reH laDHa'wI' SoH.
ghorgh DuDoy'moH ngoDvam? ghorgh bImev? ngoDmey ngeD
DayajchoHjaj!
> chovnatlhmey'e' qonbogh MO DIghajbe', 'ach chaq tugh tu'lu'. maSovbe'. Daj
> vuDlIj 'ach tobbe'.
Dal vuDlIj 'ach tobbe'.
> peHruS
charghwI' 'utlh