Re: qa'vIn

[WestphalWz@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/13/1999 9:49:53 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
aranders@netusa1.net writes:

<< ja' K'ryntes
 ><He'So' je mu'tlheghvam> DajatlhnIS 'e' vIHar. >>

And, a quote is not a direct object of <jatlh>, that I believe.  This gives:
<He'So' je mu'tlheghvam> bIjatlhnIS 'e' vIHar.  Furthermore, although it is
not necessary to put <jatlh> before the quote, I have seen it often in canon.
This gives:  bIjatlhnIS <He'So' je mu'tlheghvam> 'e' vIHar.

peHruS