tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 24 07:24:20 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: law'/puS

• From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: law'/puS
• Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 14:29:28 -0400 (EDT)

Guido #1vo':


>>Just to throw some oil on the fire ;-), there are human languages
>>that will NOT allow two adjectival modifiers* on the same noun;
>>they require something like "ship large which is green".  Maybe
>>Klingon requires you to join the modifying verbs with "and" ('ej,
>>of course, not je):  Duj tIn 'ej SuD.
>
>>bImISDI' yImISmoH!
>
>>- marqem
>
>I like this use of {'ej} to separate two adjectival verbs modifying the same
>noun. It seems more correct to me because they are really still verbs with
>the {-bogh}'s hacked off and placed on the other side of the noun.


'e' vIparqu'.  <'ej> vIleghDI', mu'tlhegh chu' naQ vInejlI'

--HoD trI'Qal
  tlhwD lIy So'

• Follow-Ups:
  • law'/puS
    • From: [email protected] (Mark E. Shoulson)

• Prev by Date: 'puter flashcards
• Next by Date: Re: BEGINNER: ramvam
• Prev by thread: Re: law'/puS
• Next by thread: law'/puS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level