tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 24 20:10:16 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
law'/puS
- From: [email protected] (Mark E. Shoulson)
- Subject: law'/puS
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 09:08:08 -0500
- In-Reply-To: "trI'Qal"'s message of Thu, 24 Mar 1994 14:29:28 -0400 (EDT) <[email protected]>
>From: "trI'Qal" <[email protected]>
>Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 14:29:28 -0400 (EDT)
>Guido #1vo':
>>>Just to throw some oil on the fire ;-), there are human languages
>>>that will NOT allow two adjectival modifiers* on the same noun;
>>>they require something like "ship large which is green". Maybe
>>>Klingon requires you to join the modifying verbs with "and" ('ej,
>>>of course, not je): Duj tIn 'ej SuD.
>>
>>>bImISDI' yImISmoH!
>>
>>>- marqem
>>
>>I like this use of {'ej} to separate two adjectival verbs modifying the same
>>noun. It seems more correct to me because they are really still verbs with
>>the {-bogh}'s hacked off and placed on the other side of the noun.
>'e' vIparqu'. <'ej> vIleghDI', mu'tlhegh chu' naQ vInejlI'
Hrmmm. DIch vIghajbe', 'ej vISovchu'be', 'ach trI'Qal vIQochbe'law'.
"'ej" HoS law' "je" HoS puS 'e' vIHarlaw' (tuyaj'a'?). mu'tlhegh naQ
jojDaq "'ej" vIlegh 'e' vIpIH.
>--HoD trI'Qal
> tlhwD lIy So'
~mark