tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 22 12:14:03 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Healthy debate

lojmIt tI'wI' nuv ([email protected])



The question is, who did Okrand write the message for? Is it being handled as if we were the intended recipients? Or is it being owned by the single recipient who is using it for his own entertainment value?

But I apologize for bringing it up. I spoke as if out of concern for a community and its common property. I keep forgetting that we aren't a community. We're just a bunch of guys scattered around the world reading email messages and arguing about a language at least ten times as often as we actually use it.

jImevnIS.

pItlh.
lojmIt tI'wI' nuv



On Dec 22, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Felix Malmenbeck wrote:

> I can't say I agree; I've personally enjoyed receiving these little updates more than I think I would have receiving them all at once.  I think it's nice to know you have something to look forward to, and that it makes receiving the updates all the sweeter.
> To me, it's kind of like the advent calendars I had when I was little.  Sure, I had an urge to open up all the doors right away, but I knew deep down that that wouldn't be as enjoyable in the long run.
> 
> //loghaD
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of lojmIt tI'wI' nuv [[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 20:08
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Healthy debate
> 
> I find this dribbling out bits of a longer message from Okrand while making repeated references to there being more that hasn't been revealed yet makes me wish Okrand had written someone else who was more selfless in his interest to share communication with Okrand with the group. I don't think this is being handled well.
> 
> pItlh.
> lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 







Back to archive top level