tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 27 07:59:37 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
- From: "Philip Newton" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:59:23 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AT3x+a6luphO2cK3HANLeeZgFNshxfY8B2EsHCXz7aWVMjNgXJEuNXoRjHvgfzEuOOvzOybS5YI8uVEPtng2pZgEbtFxaIwjJ8c6YSoYJfYgt52j0MDU4VOaoGBlr+ZMpI99Js3sGGllF67lx8aH/77+ZnNlDV84hvGELBKsFWs=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 2/27/06, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Absolutely. Although most of our examples are variants of "I am
> hungry/thirsty", look again at the example from HolQeD 12/1998 for the very
> phrase you want:
>
> qagh largh SuvwI' ghung.
> The hungry warrior smells the gagh.
Excellent; thank you very much!
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5383.33