tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 27 05:17:40 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
• Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:17:02 EST

In a message dated 2/27/2006 3:30:52 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> AFAIK Esperanto uses true verbs, though; the word for "be
> hungry" escapes me but I believe "to be thirsty" is {soifi}.)
> 

In Esperanto "hungry" is "malsata", "thirsty" is "soifa".
hunger - malsato               thirst - soifo
be hungry - malsati            be thirsty - soifi

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon word for "Bookmarklet"/"Favelet"?
• Previous by thread: Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
• Next by thread: Re: {ghung} and {'oj} as stative verbs?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level