tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 15 08:13:18 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)

Philip Newton ([email protected])

From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:13:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:03:56 -0500, Steven Boozer
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Raik Lorenz:
> > > But as I already mentioned, I'll drop this "word" anyway, as it
> > > just does not fit into Klingon, apperently.
> > > A solution might still be {che'meH vaSvo'}, wouldn't it?
> 
> Quvar:
> >Would be {che'meH vaS}, without -vo'.
> 
> Indeed.  {vo'} is the verb "propel".

Or the type-V noun suffix "from", which was what I assumed that
morpheme represented in the phrase he gave.
-- 
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 2423.16

References:
- Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
  - From: "Raik Lorenz" <[email protected]>
- Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
  - From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: ngoD (n)
Next by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: ngoD (n)
Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
Index(es):