tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 14 14:32:12 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)

cheesbro ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
• User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> > qIno'rIq wrote:
> > 
> > > Once I made up the word {che'DechqaH}, just for "narrative reasons"
> > > (nothing that is either ready-written or anywhere published, yet; 
> > > probably won't ever be <g>). Would anybody of you intentionally know 
> > > what I mean by that (Yes, I perfectly know that it's non-canon. but 
> > > just give it a try, maybe.)? Just in
> > > order to find that out, I do not mention my intention.
> > 
> > {che'}  "rule, reign, run, preside" (v.)
> > {Dech}  "surround" (v.)
> > {qaH}   "sir" (n.)
> > 
> > Haven't got a clue.  How about at least giving us the sentence it was used
> > in?
> > 
> 
> 
> Oops. Or rather: (Qu'vatlh!}
> {wa'Dich}: There was a (supposedly typical German) typo in my posting: The
> original "word" was supposed to be:
> {che'Dechqach}

rule - surround - building/structure ?

Do you mean a city wall?  Ancient cities usually had protective walls around 
them.  If this is what you mean, we have [ yergho ] for that.

How about castle?  But then how does "surround" fit into that?


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
    • From: "Raik Lorenz" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Next by Date: bDv HovlengMUSH
• Previous by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon WOTD: qum (v)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level