tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 29 08:59:03 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: RE: KLBC: Sormey Hol

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: RE: KLBC: Sormey Hol
• Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:58:38 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
• Cc: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• In-Reply-To: <7107ECAEC9ECD0119BBC00805F684B9C2492BF@VIPER>
• Priority: NORMAL

HIvqa' veqlargh! I just looked at the English translation and 
see that pagh's suggestion maps the intended thought better than 
I thought it did. SoHvaD jItlhIj, jupwI'.

charghwI' 'utlh

On Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:20:02 -0800 (PST) "Andeen, Eric" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> lab K'ryntes:
...
> > reH bommey bombogh ghotpu' tu'lu'.
> 
> This is fine, but it seems like you are a little hung up on what you want
> the English to be. Here's my suggestion for an alternative: <bomtaHwI'pu'
> tu'lu'>. Think about that, and I am sure you will come up with dozens of
> variations on how to say this. Pick the one you like best.
... 
> pagh
> Beginners' Grammarian

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: Sormey Hol
    • From: Pam Felton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: KLBC: Sormey Hol
    • From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Sormey Hol
• Next by Date: KLBC: jabbI'ID wa'DIch [ {wa'DIch jabbl'ID} 'oHpu' ]
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: Sormey Hol
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Sormey Hol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level