tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 01 07:30:27 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hech (was SaqaD)
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hech (was SaqaD)
- Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 09:30:18 CDT
- In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 30 Apr 1998 18:54:56 -0700
jIja':
> >}<<Soj pa'>> DaHech'a'?
> >
jang SuStel:
>
> This is going to drive me mad if I continue to see it over and over again,
> as I have been.
>
> To say what you're saying, it'd have to be phrased as
>
> <Soj pa'> bIjatlh 'e' DaHech'a'?
> Did you inted to say {Soj pa'}?
>
jIQaghba'. cholughmoHmo' qatlho'.
chay' mu'mey lulo'lu'? QIjchu'be' *MO*.
jIlaDchugh neH, jIghojlaHchu'be'.
jIqonchugh, jIghojlaH. DaHjaj vay' vIghoj.
vaj, QaQ jajvam!
well, I _think_ I have written sentences
before, using {... 'e' vIHech} or sim.
I guess I was just "abbreviating"
without thinking...
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]