tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 11 10:50:39 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ship classes

• From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: ship classes
• Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:52:47 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <l03020907b0d5f5d47138@[206.150.220.142]>

>And, again, I'm not convinced that {qItI'nga'} doesn't carry the "class"
>idea with it.  You dropped the word "Class" from the title, but the card
>always has "K'Tinga-Class" as the translation of {qItI'nga'}.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI'

Do'Ha', I don't have my dictionary with me right now, but isn't *'ejDo'*
translated as either "Starship" or "Starship class?"  If so, then it is
*'ejDo'* that carries the "class" meaning, and *qItI'nga' 'ejDo'* would
mean "K'Tinga class starship."

SuSvaj

• References:
  • ship classes
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Good News and Bad News
• Next by Date: Re: Good News and Bad News
• Prev by thread: ship classes
• Next by thread: Re: ship classes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level