tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 11 23:13:12 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ship classes
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ship classes
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 01:14:38 -0600
At 11:00 AM 1/11/98 -0800, SuSvaj wrote:
>
>>And, again, I'm not convinced that {qItI'nga'} doesn't carry the "class"
>>idea with it. You dropped the word "Class" from the title, but the card
>>always has "K'Tinga-Class" as the translation of {qItI'nga'}.
>>
>>-- ghunchu'wI'
>
>Do'Ha', I don't have my dictionary with me right now, but isn't *'ejDo'*
>translated as either "Starship" or "Starship class?" If so, then it is
>*'ejDo'* that carries the "class" meaning, and *qItI'nga' 'ejDo'* would
>mean "K'Tinga class starship."
>
In KGT, {qItI'nga'} is defined as K'Tinga _class_ (and {qIvo'rIt} is
K'Vort class).
-- ter'eS