tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 14 15:07:36 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: petaQneS ;-)
>Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 11:43:58 -0500
>Originator: [email protected]
>From: [email protected] (Steve Weaver)
>charghwI' responded:
>>According to Steve Weaver:
>>>..
>>> If someone has some referances for me I would appreciate a response (in
>>> tera'ngnan Hol, of course as tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhlaHbe')
>>
>>tlhIngan Hol DajatlhlaHbe'chugh vaj qatlh naDev SoHtaH?
>Someone correct my grammer on my reply (although I hope I got it right THIS
>time ... GOD, this is FUN):
> petaQnes *charghwI'*
I'm lost. "(you all) be weird (with respect), charghwI'!" You're
commanding more than one person to be weird (respectfully), but seem to be
addressing it only to charghwI'. What do you mean?
> chovaqbe'qu'
DIch Daghaj'a'? Duvaqlaw'. He certainly *sounds* like he's mocking you.
>tlhIngan Hol vIghojqu'qang 'ach *ROME*'e' 'oH chenbe' wa'jaj
You lost me again. "I'm willing to *learn* Klingon, but it's "rome"
that... it... one-day doesn't take form."
Oh, you're trying to say "rome wasn't built in a day", right? Well, you
have the day taking form (and you should make it two words: wa' jaj), and
so on. It's nice to use "chen" rather than "chenmoHlu'"; I like that. How
about "qaStaHvIS wa' jaj neH chenbe' *Rome*."
~mark