tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 06 16:23:57 2013
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Story - Out of order installments
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2013/9/6 Bellerophon, modeler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected]</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">...<br><div><div><div>I also expect to see frequent use of {-chuq} as in {Qochchuq tlhIH} or {maQochbe'chuq} for internal (dis)agreement in a group.</div>
</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div class="gmail_extra"> <br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Those phrases might be possible, we don't know. But with the current knowledge, I'd interpret them as "You are in disagreement over each other." and "We are in agreement over one another.", respectively. So not just having different or identical opinions, but acknowledging or doubting each others identity or existence.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra">Oh, and I agree with you that "disagree with a fact" is semantically (or philosophically) a bit strange. But for me {qechlIj vIQoch.} or {nabmaj luQochbe'.} sound fine to me. {ngoDqoq vIQoch.} sounds much better, and it's a good opportunity to use {-qoq}, as well.<br>
</div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol