tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 06 06:12:07 2013

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Story - Out of order installments

David Trimboli ( [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

On 9/6/2013 2:33 AM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:
Might {jIQoch(be')} be uncanonical usage?

lo'pu''a' Okrand?

tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom chutmey pabba' 'ach lo'pu' Okrand 'e' vISovbe'.

It takes two (or more) to (dis)agree.  I can't imagine MO would have
had a problem with {maQoch 'e' wIQochbe'} as it translates neatly as
"We agree that we disagree."

I'm not convinced {Qoch} can even take an object. *{ngoDvetlh vIQoch} "I disagree with that fact"? Meh.


Tlhingan-hol mailing list

Back to archive top level