tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 19 09:38:16 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq

Robyn Stewart ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']

We had the same question and Mark merely said that if Hoch was 
preferable, then use Hoch. In fact the group proofreading the page 
where it first appeared, originally replaced the word with a better 
one. It was pretty hilarious how focused we all were on the assigned task.

It seems to have a sense of individuality more distinct than the 
"each" of Hoch + singular when applied to a group.

At 09:18 19/08/2011, you wrote:
>jIyajbe' jIH je.  << majority?, nearly all?>> 'oS mu' 'e' vIQub.
>(Although how {ngIq} would differ from {HochHom} "most, greater 
>part" isn't clear.)
>
>--
>Voragh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SuStel
> >>
> >> 'eybe'bogh mu'tlheghmeylIj vIyajbe'. yIQIjchu'. "Current, not 
> previous (n)"?
> >>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ghunchu'wI' 'utlh
> >
> > ghe'naQ <'u'> bom mu'mey DIlaD 'ej DIchov.
> > ghItlhDaq 'op mu'mey DISovpu'be'bogh DItu'.
> > Soch mu' ghaj tetlh vIgherbogh.
> > naDev wa' DIp vImuch: <ngIq>
> >
> > Qatlh mu'vam. loQ <Hoch> rur.
> > cha' lo' chovnatlh DIlegh.
> >
> > wa' Doch nungchugh, le'chu' Dochvetlh. rurbogh latlh tu'lu'be'.
> >     <nqIq voDleH wItoy'.>
> > wa' voDleH neH tu'lu'. ghaH wItoy'.
> >
> > Doch law' nungchugh, ghu' rap SIQ Hoch Doch, pagh ta' rap ta' Hoch Doch,
> > 'ach quqbe'.
> > le' Hoch Doch. SIQ/vang wa' ghIq SIQ/vang latlh ghIq SIQ/vang latlh...
> >     <ngIq paqmey vIlaD.>
> > paq wa'DIch vIlaD. vIlaDta'DI', paq veb vIlaD. tagha' paq Qav 
> vIlaD. reH wa'
> > paq neH vIlaDlI'.
> >     <lomDaq tuy' ngIq SuvwI'pu'.>
> > tlheghDaq Qam SuvwI'pu'. Duv SuvwI' wa'DIch 'ej tuy'. mej. Duv SuvwI' veD
> > 'ej tuy'. mej. not tuy' cha' SuvwI'pu' quq.
> >
> > mobchugh <ngIq>, wa' le'chu'wI' 'oS 'e' vIloy, 'ach DIch vIghajlaHbe'.
> >
> > -- ghunchu'wI'

Back to archive top level