tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 19 09:41:25 2011

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq

Terrence Donnelly ([email protected])

• From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1313772007; bh=q26SWcdA18+lWleYLtI4lMonsgr+RXmUMOLIKeTAZmw=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=y9pqXratDjx7xuv/WdfAknPmJ1CZd+yERwXqbi71Kf0yQb7lLMoRffpqUgcef6VmxjvUb7vKavyQ2Yed9CEI2RUGe/LWcgL/JEhYPUpsOo8CW9QfEDmyTiH/y/P29KY2j12Mu86llOIjWFixTlD9IFXaxO6Oa07qYOpL78doRAc=
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4RJNJNuzcvLSA9WDq5LT4DDQ+kjPXCuedKcX/wvvnb5ZqZ9cmRbieG6em2K+Cwzhfm6nQDIXzaeNMW0wJSPK3waFF/o0k2aHK65/9LZekSjZn3c++/RWi7sXfw1eL4D60bFTz86v+xWNdZRHRxEftU6gTTZpipVT2hHyQ81Qw6g=;
• In-reply-to: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A602D46C0BDBE4@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>

I understood it as "sole, single, only"

-- ter'eS

--- On Fri, 8/19/11, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 11:18 AM
> jIyajbe' jIH je.  <<
> majority?, nearly all?>> 'oS mu' 'e' vIQub. 
> (Although how {ngIq} would differ from {HochHom} "most,
> greater part" isn't clear.)
> 
> --
> Voragh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SuStel
> >> 
> >> 'eybe'bogh mu'tlheghmeylIj vIyajbe'. yIQIjchu'.
> "Current, not previous (n)"?
> >> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ghunchu'wI' 'utlh
> > 
> > ghe'naQ <'u'> bom mu'mey DIlaD 'ej DIchov.
> > ghItlhDaq 'op mu'mey DISovpu'be'bogh DItu'.
> > Soch mu' ghaj tetlh vIgherbogh.
> > naDev wa' DIp vImuch: <ngIq>
> > 
> > Qatlh mu'vam. loQ <Hoch> rur.  
> > cha' lo' chovnatlh DIlegh.
> > 
> > wa' Doch nungchugh, le'chu' Dochvetlh. rurbogh latlh
> tu'lu'be'.
> >     <nqIq voDleH wItoy'.>
> > wa' voDleH neH tu'lu'. ghaH wItoy'.
> > 
> > Doch law' nungchugh, ghu' rap SIQ Hoch Doch, pagh ta'
> rap ta' Hoch Doch,
> > 'ach quqbe'.
> > le' Hoch Doch. SIQ/vang wa' ghIq SIQ/vang latlh ghIq
> SIQ/vang latlh...
> >     <ngIq paqmey vIlaD.>
> > paq wa'DIch vIlaD. vIlaDta'DI', paq veb vIlaD. tagha'
> paq Qav vIlaD. reH wa'
> > paq neH vIlaDlI'.
> >     <lomDaq tuy' ngIq
> SuvwI'pu'.>
> > tlheghDaq Qam SuvwI'pu'. Duv SuvwI' wa'DIch 'ej tuy'.
> mej. Duv SuvwI' veD
> > 'ej tuy'. mej. not tuy' cha' SuvwI'pu' quq.
> > 
> > mobchugh <ngIq>, wa' le'chu'wI' 'oS 'e' vIloy,
> 'ach DIch vIghajlaHbe'.
> > 
> > -- ghunchu'wI'
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
    • From: Felix Malmenbeck <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2012 qep'a'
• Next by Date: Re: 2012 qep'a'
• Previous by thread: RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
• Next by thread: RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level