tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 11 01:36:44 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "nga'chuq (always subject)" - Question about usage
- From: Alex Greene <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: "nga'chuq (always subject)" - Question about usage
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:34:47 +0000 (GMT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1263202487; bh=xCvsTlT0IAYTL9fkDs4ix5wuALixafgUii4xklhIVgk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wkFFkMAGXCNjB10tEu7SqYZIzbpE1tO2iNq+yWDLZAHQVSdNophO/TaXjuXH8v4hCMyQXAeXaJMq92x6v8m4MW9X4MqaZGZGQmtxINXqTTD5dS9DeXOMVeR3TpnI5HmRoBr9YBQ9WN01fvKujWvnnbWTr86/jhHWyQfxdKGQ7Zc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=syFPPDOR4e1SyuL0edY1H1sEZ8Kjo3OaIJXLzmZsp71Ur+fjhDCbVagCMB9bxGNn3nWJTDICP1ubCFo9hrFOsR0hXci5n6MQLZRsvmdkBLxRKZG29D/S+tksRsXIBJteCIL48tSGa0ejjy03JzUwSVyVikBmesbwKH4xUguXqPs=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
> Parse it as verb + -chuq and act
> accordingly.
> ~naHQun
IOW, the prefix set indicating "no object" must always be used (TKD, 4.2.1., p. 36 regarding the use of -chuq). :) Gotcha.