tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 09 06:32:16 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
- From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:30:04 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v8EmlmhjQcNZkbe9kWUdjA3VhhLTxyjF10mgXVhT2UM=; b=XttKUWWpLAz8JxZ7vPH/6CyiKWZTOuWASwGLlOZLzJ1aho8GoQEnZqNMR6GajG4Mz8 e36qWnQZOLwW5Zl5jtcAQRrSll9n8VkUR3IT75ctEktNTdcsXWmk3sQ4vc4vpPpVt3oI kC5M2C5WgrMVZJBn9LDXKTL84+0Y8DduoWPh0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oVDMFu/jhL2spNTZUhFrUi/3SW6u/p4Fcu7bsBYTpHK2Arxu3BW+59PiNCcSjeQFIn qWOOdBqh3Awi+2a+ZDVExZDAxzL/M0yMcN8ypMBlSKIGlyvkxqyjHn97aSyCvRjFqzZT gY3qetrJC8ahWhbbYlYrhQ03XEZ8COqySSUqQ=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Works for me.
lay'SIv
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Michael Everson <[email protected]>wrote:
> Not that I am in a position to propose anything, but I've always
> thought that "lIl" would be an excellent word for "difficult to
> discern; illegible".
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
>
>
>