tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 09 05:44:45 2010

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?

Michael Everson ([email protected])

• From: Michael Everson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
• Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:43:01 +0000
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

Not that I am in a position to propose anything, but I've always  
thought that "lIl" would be an excellent word for "difficult to  
discern; illegible".

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
    • From: Steven Lytle <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
    • From: Alex Greene <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qoSwIj
• Next by Date: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
• Next by thread: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level