tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 09 05:35:56 2010
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
- From: Alex Greene <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:32:48 -0800 (PST)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1263043968; bh=4lyDdUi8iLBHE6xHm6Z4TdH7XpC9+QhbgcdaL1UFJUE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fEfTwO6aVfjigWVYGzXaH9fkh+ybloMaMTp/TGv78WVbj/JvF7Jg1/iymV9a22WfoamaR78MSO92hxoh/bBvM+hMKRZqlR3OufRvLn+QlQ2eufvGx7qRddXOoj9Tc7qQxKqBAUaMbWTrdZhiJ/iVqofsn9zjctbtTs6vHbWD188=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AQryBuDtIynUNtztrhxIooTBzuWCJS7oYcW0vatbK23VFABJp5rHai2ionVnl6KyMOzmJjV5b0gnwLgg9m/9pb+mmDRGx5Cl+/vFdc5DycvAu8sJ3OS244X8K0OPi/o+WQOo45LT/r3AphM6x4NcGQRrtjaYBsFPZGJDrAtNVZw=;
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
I was using 'arlogh for "how many times?" unofficially until it appeared in KGT.
Other apocrypha I was thinking of, mostly adverbials, are:-
*loQHa' greatly, a lot
*pay'Ha' gradually
*pe'vIlHa' gently, softly, lightly, weakly
*pIjHa' infrequently, not often
*SIbI'Ha' after a delay
This is based on the apparent pattern of nItebHa' "together" and Do'Ha' "unfortunately" and I only list them because this topic is about hypotheticals.