tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 25 11:55:44 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The topic marker -'e'
Tracy Canfield wrote:
> 2009/11/25 Christopher Doty <[email protected]>:
>> Also, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF THE GODS AND ALL THAT IS HOLY, stop
>> telling me that I don't know what I am talking about. It is 1) rude,
>> 2) wrong, and 3) annoying as all hell (for me, anyway, but I imagine
>> that the other linguists also on the list might not appreciate the
>> insinuation that linguists don't know what they are talking about).
>
> maHvaD may'vam batlh tu'lu'be', Chris.
>
> rur qoH yIH je. lI'be'. cholDI' tlhInganpu' yuQqu'choH ghoghDu'chaj.
toH! Dajqu' mu'tlheghvam. porgh 'ay' 'oH ghogh'e' 'e' DanoHlaw'. mojaq
Dalo'pu'bogh vIlo'qangbe' mu'tlheghvetlh vIjatlhchugh, 'ach Dajbej wIvlIj.
'ach mu'tlheghvetlh DaghItlhpu'DI' bIQaghlaw'. DIp 'oH <yuQ>'e'. wot
DaHechpu'bogh vISovbe'.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush