tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 25 10:50:42 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The topic marker -'e'
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: The topic marker -'e'
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:49:13 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q0Gaft0QSLtHCM1Hk0ovpFTCY3sIXvSpUrL/+iZ8CL0=; b=vA64akEMEEUsacoCxtSKjPfWptjEKEvSfK/hz0Zha/ABCfGeGomG1E5zV8I4FRxC7r Flh2r5f5wYKSDo2V3XXhpm22Rc9YC3c1L9YttmKYffnl8yfRqw0p4jhunmu75RqSp4NG X25hP0FuwbpqfAc6i2hKc1i2eY/HAxha0AvNs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=maFKJtH5MTCzHM8U4ZtkdVKBJ41Gd41rvBloGyZFOvnLNNPAdiiL24J/OIaPB5MrUI zk9eOAzBlHyQa4SDvrWcYykinKVneuz5szlBth/z7IX9Z3VVZsR8yfeRhmpp4By1IwV/ Kn0Hi3t/T7NYgWsBOaSfJTRyl8eiUmj/8JLJs=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:37, André Müller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm... there are S (single argument of an intransitive sentence), A
> (agent-like argument of a transitive sentence) and P (patient-like argument
> of a transitive sentence). If a P turns into S and the A vanishes, it's
> called "passive" (cf. English). If an A turns into an S and the P vanishes,
> it's called "antipassive" (cf. Basque, Greenlandic, Caucasian lgs.).
> In Klingon, the A vanishes but the P doesn't turn into an S. It stays a P.
Yeah, I realized this after I sent the email, so it is a bit odd. But,
a pretty much unrelated side note: Okrand worked quite a bit with PNW
languages, and is this is what passives often look like in them: it's
really an inverse construction, but it ends up also being used for
passives, which might be why this seems weird.
> I agree with you here. The {-lu'} can hardly be called a passive.
*sigh* This is why I said *functionally* a passive: to the extent that
passives are about the demotion of an agent, Klingon has a passive,
because we're kicking out the agent. I agree that the syntax with it
doesn't look like a passive, and if we were to looked ""historically""
we'd probably see some other source for this system. But,
functionally, it IS a passive, even if the morpheme -lu' can't be
called a passive.