tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 24 11:37:53 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Comparatives
- From: Christopher Doty <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Comparatives
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:36:35 -0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=MGY4lh4kGyCW4iLTFwMLQ0GGdk1oKL9S96S3UIHqbDM=; b=rtCPofNcHIUhyVRT2ESvuizIwuT5Ak4fsuNwaERwm6afsheOIETbwl77pvu6BpXQEd lPzfLToV0n+6c0iM4e79yvcCB9mgo4DphIjbArgCCGDVPvV8pdk8PhfoMl+PpMFNPRsK X22VQlF5vui5V60ppIVS2/oQT+VBypnTPT/Nk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=KbAAH5iWLI1VAvTLeZhIE9UAoD1w0fvg2q1BlpU2k3I2TczYjCmWEclwj1gZYBz9xb ZfR6/sHcl2eDukBjODo5oDwXiXzrY8JeAUH+03OwQN/UALqTDeUXqDO1wRGXh+UgmgOg Ru/WEwBfk1dopv1Fh63qlB2OQ83LIRrFwKkP8=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
That section says that an adjectival verb with -Daq can't take
anything other than -qu'; it doesn't say anything about adjectives in
general being able to take other suffixes.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:30, ghunchu'wI' 'utlh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Tracy Canfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...TKD says -qu' may follow verbs functioning
>> adjectivally, but it doesn't say other suffixes *can't* occur.
>
> Read the section on adjectives again (it's short, I'll wait). :)
>
> See there? It *does* say no other suffixes besides {-qu'} may be used.
> Of course, we now know it to be too strong a prohibition. The real
> rule is generally accepted to permit only *rovers* on verbs acting
> adjectivally.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>
>