tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 24 11:36:12 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Comparatives
- From: Tracy Canfield <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Comparatives
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:35:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=708uEqTkaRu58o0pcsjf4O4wF7+EisZlEvSyhaC9kes=; b=Ii7TCXSROjCQzGMeT3/oB1zEHiWUwyD9lYJOsT+LIGoHGGho5xnAk+mMEMcaxEKCi8 f5KcGQzBeMlWiwgBg2Lij4xBUNhuJhcARvL3BqXPpplSUlyPE+6wqEMrSN0Z1Jxumln6 Df5hMsic7UkO1deyUsukuaOTed3nAbk9OQkrg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QPREPRPkJVzNnUp7JlG3cO7yNvyVgd4AeE0jLrjXliaMVAK8mBzFX4Z4F67VaV+U18 exUuao5LJpu63VdfJB+prypr1h0immoK1nYS6nlcprNnHeIryXo04WpFHDkZgJElGz27 2uDX0oFrevQNYIxcE71Z75i3CaliLoM2X+f3I=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Strictly, no, it doesn't say that. The only place in the adjective
section that it says *only* -qu may appear is when a Type 5 suffix is
attached.
2009/11/24 ghunchu'wI' 'utlh <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Tracy Canfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...TKD says -qu' may follow verbs functioning
>> adjectivally, but it doesn't say other suffixes *can't* occur.
>
> Read the section on adjectives again (it's short, I'll wait). :)
>
> See there? It *does* say no other suffixes besides {-qu'} may be used.
> Of course, we now know it to be too strong a prohibition. The real
> rule is generally accepted to permit only *rovers* on verbs acting
> adjectivally.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>
>