tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 27 18:45:38 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: nuq bach?

ghunchu'wI' (qunchuy@alcaco.net)



On May 27, 2009, at 9:01 PM, qa'vaj wrote:

> {-vaD} also marks the indirect object.

I opine differently.  What I recall TKD's addendum saying is that the  
recipient of a gift may be considered the indirect object.  I do not  
consider someone being shot to be the same sort of thing.  In my  
mind, the target is a location, not a beneficiary.

-- ghunchu'wI'






Back to archive top level