tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 23 14:34:34 2009

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Klingon orthography (was: Okrand at qep'a')

ghunchu'wI' (qunchuy@alcaco.net)



On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Michael Everson wrote:

> NuqneH

It's hard for me to take a post on orthography seriously when it  
begins by ignoring the standard orthography.

> Is there scope for a spelling reform in the Latin orthography for
> Klingon?


There might be, but your proposals don't look like Latin orthography  
to me.  Where's the "dotless question mark" key on a Latin keyboard?   
Your examples are full of untypeable characters, and a few  
unprintable ones.

If your goal is to make searches work better, there's already the  
Unicode PUA mapping.  If you want it to be more "readable", I think  
you're trying to solve something which is not a problem, and I think  
your proposed solutions are counterproductive.  I also strongly  
disagree with your statement that mutable case can "make any text  
easier to read", though I don't consider it important enough to debate.

-- ghunchu'wI'






Back to archive top level