tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 07 17:10:47 2009
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Questions with law'/puS
- From: "qe'San \(Jon Brown\)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Questions with law'/puS
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:02:30 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=wVTv+WK8gFy2I5EhT4beemfAsghegFAPK8niI9g4V3QzYcAQW2oviAln/5pQGM/ZjNaeTu22C+1HlPCGZda0WApgvvkVaouyQhgU7sZrTikbrl6LZokn86qezO030JmJE9Pp4PpzSHG9NK6Ll9QQMRRSOqYdK3MUSJnKOFF2slY= ;
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D4F5BF04908043C39D0AAEA2B571E9FE@HPBrownPC> <[email protected]>
----- Original Message -----
From: "ghunchu'wI'" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: Questions with law'/puS
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 2:59 PM, qe'San ((Jon Brown)) wrote:
>
>> Using "who?" an observer of the classic joke migh just ask a fellow
>> observer:
>>
>> 'Iv Doy' law' Hoch Doy' puS, qama' 'avwI' ghap Dangu'
>
> I think you want the imperative prefix {yI-} instead of {Da-}. I
> also think {per} "label, specify, ascertain" might be a better verb
> here than {ngu'} "identify".
I was thinking of the nuH DaneHbogh yIngu' "Which weapon do you want?" use
on p105 KGT
and that also says I should use the imperitive but I think you are correcta
nd {per} would be better.
'Iv Doy' law' Hoch Doy' puS, qama' 'avwI' ghap yIper
>
>>
>> And if that construction works then a "what?" construction might be:
>>
>> nuq nom law' Hoch nom puS, qIvo'rIt qItI'nga ghap Dangu'
>
> There's no verb meaning "be fast". {nom} "quickly" is an adverbial.
> You'd have to rephrase the question as something like this:
One of those times when I saw what I wanted to see rather than what was
actually there.
I assume the principle of what I tried is sound even if the words weren't?
nuq nIv law' Hoch nIv puS, qIvo'rIt qItI'nga ghap yIper
> nuq Do' tIn law' Hoch tIn puS?
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'