tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 18 21:18:31 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?

Robyn Stewart ([email protected])

• From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
• Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:41:28 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

At 07:58 AM 7/17/2007, you wrote:
>or simpler still:
>
>    SIrgh SuvwI'

Definitely SIrgh SuvwI'. That recaptures the alliteration that makes 
the English interesting.

> >People might get a kick out of the second line of text I plan to use:
> >
> >   {nguvmoHlu'meH QaQ jajvam}
>
>Ha!  A bilingual pun.  Okrand would love it!  <g>

It's only a pun if you translate it. If you just read it, it's 
neither funnier nor punnier than Say'moHmeH QaQ jajvam.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
    • From: McArdle <[email protected]>
  • Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
• Next by Date: Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
• Previous by thread: Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
• Next by thread: Re: Wool? In tlhIngan Hol?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level