tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 22 21:20:47 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>

qa'vaj (darqang99@gmail.com)



On Dec 22, 2007 10:08 PM, Doq <doq@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>
> I see {ghaHbogh} as marginally meaningful, requiring really special
> context that is so rare as to verge on poetry. I don't see prose
> having much use for it in an average day. If I never see this
> resolved, I doubt it will decrease the set of things I can express
> comfortably in Klingon.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
>
>
qaQochba' QIn ngeHpu'wI' jIHbogh jIH'e'.

-- 
qa'vaj
qo'lIj DachenmoHtaH






Back to archive top level