tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 23 06:30:09 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>

David Trimboli ([email protected])

• From: David Trimboli <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
• Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:28:24 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

qa'vaj wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 10:08 PM, Doq <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see {ghaHbogh} as marginally meaningful, requiring really special
>> context that is so rare as to verge on poetry. I don't see prose
>> having much use for it in an average day. If I never see this
>> resolved, I doubt it will decrease the set of things I can express
>> comfortably in Klingon.
>>
> qaQochba' QIn ngeHpu'wI' jIHbogh jIH'e'.

Ouch! How do you say "cross-eyed" in Klingon?

SuStel
Stardate 7977.0

P.S.: Maybe {mIS mInDu'}. The question was rhetorical.

-- 
Practice the Klingon language on the tlhIngan Hol MUSH.
http://trimboli.name/klingon/mush.html

• References:
  • "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
    • From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>
  • Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
    • From: Doq <[email protected]>
  • Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
    • From: qa'vaj <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: Sang (verb)
• Next by Date: Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
• Previous by thread: Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
• Next by thread: Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level